妻子的诱惑

两架F-16C近日抵台，王鸿薇批：提预算急如星火，交货姗姗来迟_我的网站

一 |     

    A worker fulfills orders for energy-saving and environmentally friendly boilers destined for export in a manufacturing enterprise in Nantong, East China's Jiangsu Province on August 4, 2026. The enterprise offers products including industrial waste disposal equipment, with sales to more than 30 countries and regions. Photo: CNS PhotoIn recent years, some economies, anxious about their own industrial competitiveness and market position, have politicized economic and trade issues, taking turns to hype false narratives such as "China overcapacity" and a "China Shock 2.0," and using them as pretexts to roll out protectionist measures.
But what are the facts on the ground?
China's Ministry of Commerce recently released a document titled China's Position on the So-Called Excess Capacity Issue. Reviewing the evolution of the global capacity landscape from a historical perspective, it offers an objective analysis of how industrial subsidies, trade surpluses, economic imbalances and market competition relate to "overcapacity," sets out China's policy practices and the direction of its efforts, and puts forward China's ideas and proposals - a forceful response to the "China overcapacity" narrative. 
Plainly, the argument that "China's inadequate domestic demand gives rise to excess capacity" rests on a logical sleight of hand - it takes a localized phenomenon at the micro level of the market and applies it wholesale to the structure of the macroeconomy, a picture far removed from reality.
China is not only a major manufacturing power but also a major consuming power. Domestic demand has long been the main engine of the Chinese economy.
To see through the logical fallacy of the "overcapacity" narrative, one must first be clear about where the Chinese economy actually sits in the global landscape.
In the course of economic globalization, China has actively integrated itself into the international division of industrial labor and become the "world's factory" in the truest sense. Chinese manufacturing has enriched the global supply of goods, lowered living costs for consumers in countries around the world, and played an important part in easing global inflationary pressure. But to define China simply as a "producer" on that basis, and from there to conclude that it suffers from "inadequate domestic demand and overcapacity," is a proposition that does not hold water.
From 2013 to 2024, domestic demand contributed an average of 93 percent to China's economic growth, with consumption and investment accounting for an average of 55 percent and 38 percent respectively. China's total retail sales of consumer goods rose from 23.8 trillion yuan ($3.53 trillion) in 2013 to 50.1 trillion yuan in 2025, doubling in size.
Measured at the World Bank's purchasing power parity rates, China's total retail sales of consumer goods in 2025 were 1.7 times those of the US, making the country the world's largest market for consumer goods in all but name. China today ranks first globally in the physical volume of goods consumed, and its per capita annual consumption of some industrial products already approaches the levels seen in developed economies.
China keeps expanding its domestic demand and is working toward a higher-level balance between supply and demand.
Growth in China's total retail sales of consumer goods has slowed somewhat in recent years, and some have taken this as proof of weak domestic demand. That reading is neither objective nor complete.
A strong domestic market provides strategic support for Chinese modernization. The outline of China's 15th Five-Year Plan (2026-30) period devotes a dedicated part to building such a market, stressing the need to adhere to the strategic focus of expanding domestic demand, to expand effective investment, to further implement special actions to boost consumption, to promote the expansion and upgrading of commodity consumption, to unleashing the potential of service consumption, to strengthening the foundation of residents' consumption and to continuously improve the consumption environment - using new demand to guide new supply, and using new supply to create new demand, so as to promote a virtuous cycle between consumption and investment, and between supply and demand, achieve a higher level of dynamic balance between supply and demand.
The slowdown in retail sales growth is consistent with China's shift from high-speed growth to high-quality development, and it also reflects the upgrading of the country's consumption structure. China's consumer market is moving faster from one dominated by goods toward one in which goods and services carry equal weight. Spending on services is growing rapidly and is expected to account for more than half of the total by 2030.
China's super-sized market is not only the bedrock of its own development but also a broad platform on which countries around the world can share in the dividends of that growth.
China has ranked as the world's second-largest importer for 17 consecutive years and is a major export destination for nearly 80 countries and regions. It has granted zero-tariff treatment to 63 countries and regions, becoming the first major economy in the world to extend full zero-tariff coverage to every African country and every least developed country that has diplomatic relations with it. It is also the only country to host an international import expo, having staged eight editions of the China International Import Expo with cumulative intended deals worth more than $580 billion. Over the 14th Five-Year Plan period (2021-25) period, China's cumulative imports topped 90 trillion yuan. These facts and figures show clearly that China is not just the "world's factory" but, still more, the "world's market."
Looking ahead, China's middle-income group is set to exceed 800 million people within little more than a decade, and per capita GDP is expected to reach the level of a moderately developed country. With vast room for consumption and ample potential and vitality, domestic demand will remain the main engine of China's economic development and will keep injecting strong momentum into world economic growth.
This was compiled and translated by the Global Times English edition based on an article published in the "Chisu Jinsheng" economic commentary column of the People's Daily on August 6, 2026.
。    AI摘要      台军“中科院”19日在屏东九鹏基地试射卫星运载火箭，因轨道异常启动自毁机制，坠落点近村庄引发居民恐慌。县政府要求暂停试射、查明原因并修正程序以避开聚落。         外传台当局向美采购的66架F-16C／D Block70战机，首批2架战机将于本周末飞抵台湾，台“空军司令部”18日初步证实是“近日”。国民党民代王鸿薇19日表示，此新式战机采购案整体延宕约1至2年，造成台湾防务出现空隙。民进党当局提出“特别预算”时总是急如星火，预算通过、交货期程要结束时却常发生延宕、解约的状况。         王鸿薇表示，原定今年应全部交货66架的F-16，千等万等，终于有2架姗姗来迟。台空军18日证实，台当局向美采购的66架F-16C／D Block70战机，有2架将于“近日”返台。然而，当初购买战机时，还编列新式战机采购特别预算超过2472亿元（新台币，下同），原定期程是2024年交机到2026年度完成交机作业，延宕到今年才开始交货，全案进度整体延宕大约1至2年，要到明后年才会全数完成，这也造成台湾“空防”出现空隙。    王鸿薇说，从民进党上台以来，已经有4项与防务有关的“特别预算”，已“三读”的6000多亿元，还不包含公务预算与正在审查中的“无人载具特别条例”草案。每次台行政机构及台防务部门在提出“特别预算”时，总是提出对防务的必要性及急迫性，然而在交货时，常常发生期程延宕、战力不符需求，甚至解约的状况。例如过去她曾经提过的无人机反制系统、M30发射药、RDX（黑索今）炸药采购案都解约，而受到台湾民众关注的新式战机和潜舰自造进程也不断延宕。    王鸿薇指出，每次民进党当局提出“特别预算”时，总是急如星火，“在野党”民代质疑时除了用机密回应，也不断扣上延宕防务的帽子；但当预算通过、交货期程要结束时，却常发生延宕、解约的状况，和当初提出的必要性及急迫性显然不符。她认为，台当局防务部门在建案时，除了评估必要性，更应该考虑交货期程，才不会产生花了大量纳税钱及时间，却造成空隙的状况。

Current article:http://rgs0.yaoyaotoutuanmieshaideizun.buzz/xju2doz/9zxwnj.html

Published on:00:49:24